IMPLICIT THEORIES OF PERSONALITY SCALE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34142/23129387.2026.75.31Abstract
Relevance of the study. Today, Ukrainian psychodiagnostics needs modern psychodiagnostic tools designed to serve the benefit of psychological science and practice. For the first time, the concept of "implicit personality theory" was proposed in the middle of the last century and was used to denote naive, unscientific knowledge about human psychology. The term "implicit" stands for internal, unexpressed, and, at the same time, undeniable, unconditional. Implicit theory is a set of views and judgments of a person that underlie the regulation of his behavior. Subsequently, this psychological category was clarified in content, its structure was determined, the basic functions and sources of genesis were shown.
In the development of the concept of "implicit theories", a large role was played by the cognitive direction, which expresses the idea that people usually put forward hypotheses and formulate theories (assumptions), which become the explanatory basis of their worldview.
Implicit theories are subjective explanatory schemes of objective reality, unique and original ideas about oneself, the world and events, other people and their actions. They act as schemes necessary for building a holistic picture of the world, performing a regulatory and prognostic function, the basis for stereotyping, causal attribution and other phenomena of interpersonal perception. The formation of implicit theories is associated with the action of many factors, primarily with personal experience. They relate to a certain part of reality contained in the life context of the individual.
Results. The Ukrainian-language version of the methodology for studying implicit theories of personality was adapted. The validity and reliability of the methodology have been proven.
Conclusions. The presented standardized diagnostic method for studying implicit theories of personality is a valid and reliable tool for diagnosing the degree of development of ideas about the possibilities of changes and improvement of personal qualities and abilities of a person.
It was shown that implicit theories of an enriched personality predict higher self-efficacy, the idea that successes and failures in interpersonal communication and professional activity can be controlled.
Downloads
References
Галецька І. (2015). Клініко-психологічне дослідження : навч. посібник. Львів : Видавничий центр ЛНУ імені Івана Франка, 210-212 с.
Галецька І. І. (2003). Самоефективність у структурі соціально-психологічної адаптації. Вісник Львівського університету. Серія «Філософські науки», 5, 433-442.
Горбунова В.В. (2008). Проблеми дослідження імпліцитних теорій. Соціальна психологія. №4 (30), 17-28.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Clifs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bruner, J.S., Tagiuri, R. (1954). The perception of people. In: Lindzey, G. (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology. (vol. ІІ, pp. 634–654). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Chiu, C.Y., Dweck, C.S., Tong, J.Y.Y., & Fu, J.H.Y. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 923-940.
Dweck, C. S. (1996). Implicit theories as organizers of goals and behavior. In P.Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: The relation of cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 69-90). NY: Guilford.
Dweck C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Erdley. C. A., & Dweck, C. S. (1993). Children’s implicit personality theories as predictors of their social judgments. Child Development, 64, 863-878.
Kelly G. (1963). A Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. W. W. Norton, 190 p.
Nisbett, R., Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Clifs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Pocked Oxford Dictionary (2005). N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York: Academic Press
Sarbin, T.R., Taft, R., & Bailey, D.E. (1960). Clinical inference and cognitive theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Великий тлумачний словник сучасної української мови (2002). – К.: Ірпінь: ВТФ “Перун”, 1440 с., с. 1239
Фоменко К.І. (2026). Імпліцитні теорії інтелекту та особистості у зв’язку з губристичною мотивацією у студентів. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Психологічні науки. Вип. 5, Т.2, 71-75.
Щербакова О. Psychodiagnostics of implicit theories of inteligence for middleschool pupils/ Щербакова О.// Вісник ХНПУ імені Г.С. Сковороди. Психологія. Вип. 58. Харків: ХНПУ, 2018. — 118 - 124 с.
Фоменко К.І., Леонідова Д.В., Кузнецов О.І. (2025). Коротка шкала атрибуції успіхів та невдач у міжособистісному спілкуванні. Журнал «Перспективи та інновації науки» (Серія «Педагогіка», Серія «Психологія», Серія «Медицина») № 1(47), 1809-1821. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-4952-2025-1(47)-1809-1821
Фоменко К.І., Леонідова Д.В.(2024). Коротка шкала атрибуції успіхів та невдач у професійній діяльності. Журнал «Перспективи та інновації науки» (Серія «Педагогіка», Серія «Психологія», Серія «Медицина») № 12(46) 2024. 1355-1371. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-4952-2024-12(46)-1341-1354
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.